Schools enjoy flexibility within the overall curriculum to include additional or alternative courses 24 Aug To do the IB, or not to do the IB? That — given the argument that surrounds curriculum choice in Hong Kong — is the question, especially in an expatriate community where the International Baccalaureate is not always fully understood. It is interesting that the dilemma persists. While not as old an examination as A-levels, which were introduced inthe IB is not a baby:
Do not instantly seize upon a title that sounds appealing and plunge into it headlong. Instead, read carefully all titles that is, all topics or questions on the list.
Remember that you may not change the title to something else that you wish you had been asked, but must respond to what the IB has given. What are the key words or concepts? Are there key words of the Theory of Knowledge course in the title -- words such as "belief", "justification", or "truth"?
Are you clear about what they mean? Are you aware of ambiguities, or of possible alternative meanings? Think back on class discussions and check class notes. How are the key concepts related to each other?
Put the title into your own words to make sure you understand what is being asked. Do not even consider skipping this step. What exactly are you being told to do? What are the key words of instruction? If you are told to "analyse" or "evaluate" a claim, then you are supposed to consider the arguments both for and against it, taking into account any ambiguities interpreting it.
Possible responses, for example: If you are asked "to what extent" or "in what way" the statement is justified, then you are being asked the same thing, but in different words.
If you are being asked a question directly "Is x true? If you are asked to "compare" areas of knowledge or ways of knowing, justifications, methodologies, or the like, you are being asked to examine both similarities and differences in response to the title.
In some cases, the "how" question is simply a variation of "in what way?
Ultimately, all titles in Theory of Knowledge, no matter how they are phrased, ask you to do the same thing. You are being asked to think critically about major issues of knowledge.
These instructions tell you exactly what you are expected to do in your essay: Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them. If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention.
Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title as given; do not alter it in any way. Your essay must be between and words in length. Pay attention to the description of the top mark in each of the six criteria in order to set your goals for an appropriate essay.
It does you little good to play a brilliant game of football if you are being assessed on playing tennis.
Note that the first two criteria emphasized in importance by being given double knowledge implied by the prescribed title is at the core of the Knowledge Issue s criterion, and that analysis and evaluation are at the core of the Quality of Analysis criterion.
This is a crucial step. Look at the descriptions of the zeroes in the Assessment Criteria! Do you understand clearly what a "problem of knowledge" is? If not, re-read the explanation: Uncertainties and difficulties are an integral part of our search for knowledge, and may even depending on your values make it more humanly interesting.
Do not treat an area of knowledge as inherently inferior simply because it is more difficult to assert that we can know something in that area than it is in others. Do all cultures see these problems in the same way? What comparisons can you draw, what general conclusions do you reach, and what arguments can be made against those conclusions?Need to get in writes I am curious as to whether the written essay section of the test is usually a persuasive or a narrative text, so that I will know which to practice and also what kind of things in the way of math and science general knowlege I should study for the exam.
IB English A Language & Literature: Course Book: Oxford IB Diploma Program Course Book [Rob Allison, Brian Chanen] on arteensevilla.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Fully comprehensive, challenging and engaging, this text was developed with the IB to exactly match the syllabus for SL and HL.
With unparalleled insight into IB assessment. Visual Arts: Course Companion (Oxford Ib Diploma Programme) [Jayson Paterson, Simon Poppy, Andrew Vaughan] on arteensevilla.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Strengthen potential in IB Visual Arts. The only resource matched to the IB Visual Arts Guide, this essential Course Book breaks down and clarifies all the assessment .
Founded in the International Baccalaureate (IB) is a non-profit foundation, which offers four high quality and challenging educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools. Sep 01, · This is a short guide to the May Essay Titles - just an introduction to each title. I will post deeper, more detailed analyses soon.
Please ensure that you get the exact titles from your ToK Teacher, I am unable to print the exact titles here for copyright reasons. Click hyperlinked titles to be. H ere is a short checklist of points to watch out for when writing the TOK Essay.
Over the years I have proof-read uncountable essays, and there are often similar issues that appear. Many of these issues are addressed below.