Against use of animals in scientific

Technology Animal Testing Pros and Cons List of 8 Facts to Consider Animal testing is a process in which small animals like rats, mice, rabbits, pigs, dogs etc. This is a regular practice in drug development and other areas of scientific research. It is widely used in areas of pharmacologicalbio-medical and biological research which needs an alternative to humans body.

Against use of animals in scientific

At the same time I understand that humans are of a higher conscience and it would be morally wrong to put a human through pain and infliction that could have long lasting damage.

So what do the experts think? When experimenting on an animal, certain procedure needs to be carried out. While the animal is put through rigorous testing, laboratories are required to make sure experiments are performed in as humane of a way as possible.

Replace, Reduce, and Refine. The first step of replacing is first seeing if there is an alternative to using animals for an experiment. Instead, things such as cell culture, modeling, or human volunteers are considered. If these are not plausible options, then testing goes to animals.

Researchers look to see if they can use the least amount of animals possible. This is what is known as reducing. Lastly, a step known as refining is taken.

How is this done? The goal is to increase our knowledge in the science community, have a better understanding of diseases, figure out solutions or treatments to prevent such diseases from happening, and to believe it or not improve the lives of humans, the environment, and animals!

Animals have similar structures in their anatomy and biological processes to humans so by watching how their bodies work can give us the insight needed to protect ourselves if something harmful spreads and how to combat such difficulties to our way of living.

In fact, both species share a multitude of illnesses. In knowing that researchers are very careful in selecting what animals to use for testing based upon what they can contract that is the same as humans.

Since humans get these types of complications themselves, it makes sense to use that specific animal to find out how to handle the problem. The same can be said for using cats for experimental purposes that relate to visual impairment issues.

Dogs are looked at for things including diabetes, cancer, blood disorders, especially haemophilia. This all sounds like great reasons to have tests done on animals, but many would disagree.

Against use of animals in scientific

Members of this organization say that the harsh reality is many of these animals are actually injected with diseases that they normally would not be susceptible to.

Several British universities as well as Yale School of Medicine seem to agree that animal testing is pointless. They take on the perspective that a lot of what we know about diseases stems from human research such with what we know about smoking and cancer, cholesterol, heart disease, and even AIDs.

Included in their argument is that at some point a human will have to participate in a trial to see if a treatment works so using animals first would be unnecessary. The purpose of testing on these animals and reaching a treatment to attack against a disease is what gives us initial hope that it will work on humans.

If researchers just went straight to testing on humans without knowing before hand that a certain medicine has the potential to work, than more humans would be at risk for greater damage to their health.

In the end, there begs the question of do we sacrifice a small portion of the animal population for the greater good of human life or should there be greater regulations in place as to what to do with animals?

Against use of animals in scientific

The debate still carries on and in my personal opinion finding animals that can contract the same kinds of diseases and illnesses as humans are absolutely important to look at.Oct 23,  · Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies.

Human beings and many animals have similar organ systems and body processes. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, the development of products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" is advocated instead of testing on animals (3).

Animal testing should be completely outlawed or modified to where animals do not suffer, because experimentation is cruel and unfair and does not have enough beneficial results to deem it necessary.

Humans and animals have many characteristics in common. 2 thoughts on “ Should Animals Be Used in Scientific Experiments? Haley Amanda Toadvine October 21, at pm. I really enjoyed this blog. I liked that you showed both sides of the argument. As sad and horrible as animal testing is, I do see its necessity when it comes to human’s lives.

Introduction Animals are often used as an experimental medium by scientists for their scientific research.

Even though research ethical codes state the use of a human being is not excused, use of animate being is still not showing good judgement and not adequate to give satisfaction based on animals.

What laws do, instead, is establish standards for the humane treatment and housing of animals in labs, and they encourage researchers to limit or seek alternatives to the use of animals, when doing that is consistent with the scientific goals of their research.

List of Pros and Cons of Animal Research | OccupyTheory